Upper gi bleeding - Nursing Case Study
Pathophysiology
• Primary mechanism: Upper GI bleeding often results from peptic ulcers, where the stomach or duodenal lining is eroded by stomach acid, leading to vessel exposure and bleeding.
• Secondary mechanism: Esophageal varices, which are swollen veins in the esophagus due to increased pressure from liver cirrhosis, can rupture and cause significant bleeding.
• Key complication: If not managed promptly, upper GI bleeding can lead to hypovolemic shock, a life-threatening condition due to severe blood loss, highlighting the importance of rapid assessment and intervention.
Patient Profile
Demographics:
45-year-old male, office worker
History:
• Key past medical history: Occasional heartburn, no previous episodes of GI bleeding
• Current medications: Omeprazole 20 mg daily for heartburn
• Allergies: None known
Current Presentation:
• Chief complaint: Mild upper abdominal discomfort and dark stools
• Key symptoms: Black, tarry stools for the past two days, mild nausea, no vomiting
• Vital signs: Blood pressure 120/80 mmHg, heart rate 78 bpm, respiratory rate 16 breaths per minute, temperature 98.6°F, oxygen saturation 98% on room air
Section 1
Initial Assessment Findings:
Upon the patient's arrival at the emergency department, a focused initial assessment was conducted to evaluate the extent of the upper GI bleeding. The patient appeared alert and oriented, showing no signs of acute distress. His skin was warm and dry, with normal capillary refill time, indicating stable peripheral perfusion. Abdominal examination revealed mild tenderness in the epigastric region without guarding or rebound tenderness, suggesting that any inflammatory process was not severe. There was no evidence of ascites or hepatomegaly upon palpation. Given the patient's history of heartburn and current presentation, a peptic ulcer was suspected as the most likely source of bleeding.
Laboratory tests were ordered to further assess the patient's condition. Complete blood count (CBC) results showed a hemoglobin level of 12.5 g/dL, which is slightly below the normal range for adult males, indicating mild anemia likely due to blood loss. Serum electrolytes and liver function tests were within normal limits, ruling out significant liver disease as a contributing factor to the bleeding. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was mildly elevated, a common finding in upper GI bleeding due to blood digestion. An urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was planned for definitive diagnosis and potential therapeutic intervention.
The nursing team initiated standard care protocols, including administering IV fluids to maintain hemodynamic stability and ensure adequate tissue perfusion. Proton pump inhibitor therapy was intensified to manage gastric acid secretion and promote ulcer healing. The patient was placed on NPO (nothing by mouth) status in preparation for the upcoming EGD. Despite the initial findings suggesting a stable condition, the healthcare team remained vigilant for any signs of deterioration, such as increased abdominal pain or changes in vital signs, which could indicate worsening of the bleeding or development of new complications.
Section 2
Response to Interventions
Following the initiation of IV fluid therapy and intensified proton pump inhibitor treatment, the nursing team closely monitored the patient for any changes in his condition. Over the next few hours, the patient's vital signs remained stable, with a blood pressure of 118/76 mmHg and a heart rate of 82 beats per minute. His respiratory rate was steady at 16 breaths per minute, and his oxygen saturation remained at 98% on room air. These stable vital signs indicated that the interventions were effectively maintaining hemodynamic stability, and there were no immediate signs of further blood loss.
The patient reported a mild decrease in abdominal discomfort, which suggested a positive response to the proton pump inhibitor therapy. He remained on NPO status, and a plan was in place to reassess his nutritional needs following the EGD. The nursing team continued to monitor his urine output, which stayed within normal limits, further indicating adequate renal perfusion and overall stability.
As the patient awaited his scheduled EGD, the healthcare team remained vigilant, ready to address any potential complications. The goal was to maintain the patient's current stable condition and ensure a smooth transition to the diagnostic procedure, where further assessment and possible therapeutic intervention could take place. The team also prepared to educate the patient about the EGD process, addressing any questions or concerns he might have, to ensure his comfort and cooperation during the procedure.
Section 3
As the EGD was performed, the results revealed a small, non-bleeding gastric ulcer with clean edges, indicating the likely source of the patient's upper GI bleeding. The ulcer was deemed low-risk for re-bleeding, and the gastroenterologist recommended continuing the current proton pump inhibitor therapy. The EGD also showed no signs of esophageal varices or other complicating factors, which was reassuring to both the healthcare team and the patient. This diagnostic clarity allowed the team to shift their focus toward recovery and prevention of future episodes.
Following the EGD, the patient's care plan included reintroduction of clear fluids, with gradual advancement of diet as tolerated. The nursing team educated the patient on lifestyle modifications to prevent exacerbation of the ulcer, such as avoiding non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and limiting alcohol and caffeine intake. The patient was also encouraged to report any recurrence of symptoms like abdominal pain or dark stools immediately.
The patient expressed relief after learning about the findings and was eager to adhere to the recommended lifestyle changes. He was scheduled for a follow-up appointment with the gastroenterologist to reevaluate his condition and discuss long-term management strategies. The nursing team documented the care plan, ensuring that the patient understood his discharge instructions and the importance of medication adherence to support healing and prevent further complications. With these measures in place, the patient was prepared for a safe discharge in the coming days, marking a positive step in his recovery journey.
Section 4
As the patient continued his recovery, the nursing team conducted an initial assessment to establish a baseline following the EGD. His vital signs were stable, with a blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg, heart rate of 78 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and an oxygen saturation of 98% on room air. The patient reported mild epigastric discomfort, which was expected given the recent finding of a gastric ulcer, but there was no evidence of active bleeding. His abdomen was soft and non-tender upon palpation, and bowel sounds were present in all four quadrants, indicating normal gastrointestinal function.
Lab results showed a hemoglobin level of 12.5 g/dL, slightly below the normal range, but consistent with the mild blood loss previously suspected. The patient's complete blood count and metabolic panel were otherwise unremarkable, providing additional reassurance of his stable condition. The nursing team continued to monitor his fluid intake, ensuring he was tolerating the clear liquids without nausea or vomiting, and planned to advance his diet to include soft foods as tolerated.
The patient responded positively to the interventions, expressing a good understanding of his dietary restrictions and medication regimen. He was compliant with the proton pump inhibitor therapy and keen on adopting the recommended lifestyle modifications. The nursing team reinforced the importance of avoiding specific triggers and encouraged the patient to maintain regular follow-up appointments. With his condition stable and the plan of care effectively supporting his recovery, the patient was well-positioned for a successful discharge, with an optimistic outlook for managing his condition and preventing future complications.
Section 5
As the patient continued his recovery, the nursing team observed a positive response to the interventions, with the patient exhibiting an overall improvement in his symptoms. However, during a routine assessment, the patient mentioned a slight increase in his epigastric discomfort, particularly after meals. The nursing team promptly reassessed his vital signs, which remained stable with a blood pressure of 118/76 mmHg, heart rate of 80 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and an oxygen saturation of 98% on room air. The patient's abdomen was still soft and non-tender, and bowel sounds were present in all quadrants.
Given the patient's report of increased discomfort, the nursing team collaborated with the healthcare provider to review recent diagnostic results. The repeat hemoglobin level was 12.4 g/dL, slightly lower than the previous value but not indicative of significant ongoing bleeding. A repeat EGD was considered to reassess the status of the gastric ulcer and ensure there were no new developments. In the meantime, the patient was encouraged to maintain small, frequent meals and continue adhering to his medication regimen.
The patient was receptive to these recommendations and actively participated in discussions about potential dietary adjustments to alleviate his symptoms. The nursing team emphasized the importance of avoiding foods known to exacerbate gastric irritation, such as spicy or highly acidic foods, and reiterated the importance of taking his medications as prescribed. With the patient's continued engagement and understanding of his care plan, the team remained confident in his ability to manage his condition effectively while awaiting further diagnostic evaluation.