postoperative bleeding - Nursing Case Study

Pathophysiology

• Primary mechanism: Disruption of blood vessels during surgery can lead to inadequate hemostasis, where the body fails to form a stable clot, resulting in continued bleeding at the surgical site.

• Secondary mechanism: Coagulation factor consumption or dysfunction may occur, often due to factors like dilution from intravenous fluids or pre-existing clotting disorders, leading to impaired clot formation.

• Key complication: If not addressed, postoperative bleeding can cause hematoma formation, increased risk of infection, and delayed wound healing, necessitating prompt nursing assessment and intervention.

Patient Profile

Demographics:

45-year-old female, office manager

History:

• Key past medical history: Hypertension, appendectomy

• Current medications: Lisinopril 10 mg daily

• Allergies: Penicillin

Current Presentation:

• Chief complaint: Mild postoperative bleeding

• Key symptoms: Slight oozing from surgical site, no signs of infection

• Vital signs: Blood pressure 118/76 mmHg, heart rate 82 bpm, respiratory rate 18 breaths per minute, temperature 98.4°F, oxygen saturation 98% on room air

Section 1

Initial Assessment Findings:

Upon initial assessment, the nursing team carefully evaluated the surgical site, noting the presence of mild oozing but no purulent discharge or significant swelling, suggesting a lack of infection. The dressing was slightly stained with blood, but the bleeding had not soaked through. The patient's vital signs remained stable with a blood pressure of 118/76 mmHg, a heart rate of 82 bpm, and an oxygen saturation of 98% on room air, indicating that the patient was hemodynamically stable. The patient reported minimal discomfort around the incision site, rating her pain as 3 out of 10. The surrounding skin appeared warm but not erythematous, and the patient denied experiencing any chills or fever.

In addition to the physical assessment, the nurse reviewed the patient's medical history and noted her hypertension, controlled with Lisinopril, which could potentially affect her healing process. The nurse also considered the possibility that the use of intravenous fluids during the surgery might have contributed to dilutional coagulopathy, though the patient's clotting profile was not immediately available. The patient's laboratory results were pending, but the nurse planned to monitor the patient's complete blood count and coagulation panel closely to assess for any underlying coagulation abnormalities.

Based on these findings, the nursing team decided to reinforce the dressing and educate the patient on signs of increased bleeding or infection, such as increased pain, redness, swelling, or fever. The nurse communicated with the surgical team to discuss the potential need for further diagnostic evaluation or intervention should the bleeding not resolve. This initial assessment set the stage for continued monitoring and ensured that the patient and her care team remained vigilant in preventing potential complications.

Section 2

New Diagnostic Results:

A few hours after the initial assessment, the patient's laboratory results became available, providing a clearer picture of her current condition. The complete blood count showed a hemoglobin level of 12.5 g/dL and a hematocrit of 37%, both within normal limits, suggesting that there had been no significant blood loss. Her platelet count was 210,000/µL, which was also normal, indicating adequate clotting potential in the absence of thrombocytopenia. However, the coagulation panel revealed a slightly prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 38 seconds, just above the normal range, which might have contributed to the mild oozing at the surgical site. The prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) were within normal limits, ruling out major coagulopathy.

The nursing team shared these results with the surgical team, who decided that, given the patient's stable condition and the minor nature of the findings, no immediate change in management was required. Instead, they opted to continue monitoring the patient closely, focusing on maintaining her blood pressure and ensuring effective pain management to prevent undue stress on the surgical site. The surgical team also considered the possibility that the mild prolongation of aPTT could be related to the intravenous fluids given during surgery and advised monitoring for any signs of increased bleeding.

The nurse reinforced the patient's education on monitoring for changes at the surgical site, emphasizing the importance of staying alert to any signs of increased bleeding or infection. The patient was encouraged to call for assistance if she noticed any changes in her condition, such as increased pain or swelling, and to continue to report her pain levels regularly. With a shared understanding of the current status and a plan in place, both the patient and the care team felt confident in managing her recovery and addressing any potential complications proactively.

Section 3

As the day progressed, the nurse continued to monitor the patient closely for any changes in her condition, particularly keeping an eye on the surgical site for signs of increased bleeding. During the evening assessment, the nurse noted that the dressing over the surgical incision showed minor oozing, but there was no significant increase compared to earlier observations. The patient’s vital signs remained stable, with a blood pressure of 118/76 mmHg, heart rate of 78 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation at 98% on room air. The patient reported her pain as a 3 out of 10 on the pain scale, which was well-managed with the current analgesic regimen.

The nurse assessed the patient's surgical site more closely, noting that the mild oozing was consistent with the earlier findings of slight aPTT prolongation. The surrounding skin was warm but not excessively red or swollen, and there was no purulent drainage. The patient did not exhibit any signs of systemic infection, such as fever or chills. Given these findings, the nurse reinforced the importance of keeping the surgical site clean and dry, and reminded the patient to avoid any activities that might strain the area until further notice.

The nurse communicated these findings to the surgical team, who agreed that the current plan of vigilant monitoring and conservative management was still appropriate. They emphasized the importance of continued education and reassurance for the patient, as her understanding and involvement in her care were crucial for a smooth recovery. The team planned to reassess the patient the following morning, considering the possibility of adjusting her anticoagulation regimen if necessary, should the aPTT remain slightly elevated without clinical correlation. This collaborative approach aimed to support the patient's healing process while minimizing the risk of further complications.

Section 4

The following morning, the nurse conducted a thorough assessment of the patient, paying close attention to the surgical site and overall condition. Upon examination, the nurse noted that the oozing from the incision had slightly decreased, and the dressing was less saturated than before. The surrounding skin remained warm but continued to show no signs of significant redness or swelling. The patient's vital signs were stable, with a blood pressure of 120/78 mmHg, heart rate of 80 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 18 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation maintaining at 99% on room air. The patient reported her pain level as a 2 out of 10, indicating effective pain management.

A review of the latest lab results showed that the aPTT was still mildly prolonged but had not worsened since the last assessment. The patient's hemoglobin levels remained within normal limits, suggesting no significant blood loss. The surgical team visited the patient and, after evaluating the findings, decided to continue with the conservative management approach. They reiterated the importance of monitoring for any changes in bleeding or signs of infection. The patient was reassured about the progress and informed that these findings were within expected parameters for her postoperative stage.

The nurse reinforced the patient's education on incision care, underscoring the necessity of adhering to activity restrictions to prevent strain on the surgical site. Encouraged by the positive trends in her recovery, the patient expressed confidence in her care plan and committed to following the advice given by the healthcare team. With the surgical team planning another review later in the day, the focus remained on maintaining vigilance and supporting the patient's healing process, ensuring a seamless transition to her eventual discharge.

Section 5

Later that afternoon, the nurse conducted another assessment of the patient, focusing on any changes in her condition. Upon entering the room, the nurse noticed the patient appeared more comfortable and was sitting up in bed reading a book. The patient's vital signs remained stable with a blood pressure of 118/76 mmHg, heart rate of 82 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 18 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation steady at 99% on room air. The nurse examined the surgical site and observed that the incision had continued to show improvement; the oozing had further diminished, and the dressing was only slightly stained. The skin around the incision was still warm to the touch but showed no redness or swelling, indicating no signs of infection.

In reviewing the patient's latest lab results, the nurse noted that the aPTT had returned to normal range, which was a positive sign indicating improved coagulation status. Hemoglobin levels remained stable, confirming that there was no significant blood loss. The surgical team, upon their afternoon visit, expressed satisfaction with the patient's progress and decided to continue with the current conservative management plan. They emphasized the importance of continued monitoring for any changes and reinforced the need for the patient to adhere to the prescribed activity restrictions.

The patient expressed relief and satisfaction with the progress, feeling reassured by the stability of her condition. She remained committed to following her care plan, including performing gentle range-of-motion exercises as advised by the physiotherapy team to aid in her recovery without straining the surgical site. With plans for discharge being discussed, the focus shifted to preparing the patient for a safe transition home. The nurse provided additional education on recognizing signs of infection or complications, ensuring the patient felt confident in managing her recovery independently once discharged.