myocardial infarction - Nursing Case Study
Pathophysiology
• Primary mechanism: Coronary artery occlusion due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture leads to thrombus formation, severely restricting blood flow and oxygen supply to the myocardial tissue, causing ischemia and subsequent myocardial cell death.
• Secondary mechanism: Oxygen deprivation initiates anaerobic metabolism within myocardial cells, resulting in lactic acid accumulation, decreased ATP production, and cellular damage, further exacerbating necrosis and loss of cardiac function.
• Key complication: The necrotic myocardial tissue can lead to impaired contractility and electrical conduction, potentially resulting in heart failure, arrhythmias, or even cardiac arrest if not promptly managed.
Patient Profile
Demographics:
58-year-old male, construction worker
History:
• Key past medical history: Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia
• Current medications: Metformin, Lisinopril, Atorvastatin, Aspirin
• Allergies: Penicillin
Current Presentation:
• Chief complaint: Severe chest pain radiating to the left arm
• Key symptoms: Shortness of breath, nausea, diaphoresis, mild dizziness
• Vital signs: Blood pressure 150/95 mmHg, heart rate 105 bpm, respiratory rate 22 breaths/min, temperature 98.6°F, SpO2 92% on room air
Section 1
As the healthcare team continues to monitor the patient, new diagnostic results are obtained to further assess the extent of the myocardial infarction. An ECG reveals ST-segment elevation in the anterior leads, confirming an anterior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Blood tests show elevated cardiac biomarkers, with troponin levels significantly increased, indicating myocardial necrosis. A chest X-ray indicates mild pulmonary congestion, suggesting the beginning signs of heart failure. These findings align with the current clinical picture of myocardial ischemia and potential cardiac impairment.
The patient's status is closely monitored, and additional lab results indicate a worsening metabolic profile. Blood glucose levels are elevated at 240 mg/dL, and there is evidence of metabolic acidosis with an arterial blood gas analysis showing a pH of 7.31, HCO3- of 18 mEq/L, and pCO2 of 34 mmHg. The metabolic disturbances are likely exacerbated by the stress of the acute myocardial event and the patient's underlying Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, necessitating careful adjustment of his metabolic management plan.
Given these developments, the clinical team initiates interventions aimed at reperfusion and stabilization. The patient is administered a thrombolytic agent to dissolve the occlusive thrombus and restore myocardial perfusion, alongside intravenous nitroglycerin to reduce cardiac workload and control blood pressure. Despite these efforts, the patient's oxygen saturation remains suboptimal, necessitating supplemental oxygen therapy. The evolving situation requires ongoing assessment to detect any further complications, such as arrhythmias or progression to heart failure, and to promptly adjust the treatment strategy to support the patient's recovery. The team prepares for potential escalation of care, including consideration of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if thrombolytic therapy does not yield the desired outcomes.
Section 2
As the healthcare team continues their vigilant monitoring of the patient, they notice a change in his status indicating further complications. Approximately two hours after the administration of thrombolytic therapy, the patient begins to exhibit signs of increased respiratory distress. His respiratory rate has risen to 28 breaths per minute, and he is using accessory muscles to breathe. His oxygen saturation, despite supplemental oxygen, has dropped to 88%. Auscultation of the lungs reveals diffuse crackles, particularly at the bases, suggesting worsening pulmonary edema and progression towards acute heart failure.
Simultaneously, the patient's blood pressure has decreased to 90/60 mmHg, indicating hypotension that may be exacerbated by the intravenous nitroglycerin, which is aimed at reducing cardiac workload but may now be contributing to hemodynamic instability. Heart sounds reveal a new S3 gallop, further supporting the suspicion of heart failure. The patient also reports feeling lightheaded and has developed a cold, clammy skin, which are signs consistent with decreased perfusion.
In response to these alarming changes, the clinical team must quickly reassess the management plan. The nitroglycerin infusion rate is reduced to mitigate the hypotension, and a diuretic is considered to manage the pulmonary congestion. Additionally, continuous cardiac monitoring is essential to detect any arrhythmias, as the combination of myocardial ischemia and electrolyte imbalances from metabolic acidosis heightens the risk of life-threatening dysrhythmias. The team debates early initiation of PCI in light of the patient's deteriorating condition and suboptimal response to thrombolytic therapy, weighing the benefits of mechanical reperfusion to prevent further myocardial damage and stabilize the patient.
Section 3
In light of the patient's deteriorating condition and the team's decision to adjust the management plan, the focus shifts to the patient's response to these interventions. After reducing the nitroglycerin infusion, there is a slight improvement in blood pressure, now reading 95/65 mmHg, though it remains on the lower side. The team administers a dose of intravenous furosemide to address the pulmonary congestion. Within thirty minutes, the patient begins to produce a significant amount of urine, indicating a diuretic effect, and his respiratory rate decreases to 24 breaths per minute. Supplemental oxygen through a non-rebreather mask is maintained, and the oxygen saturation rises slightly to 90%, suggesting marginal improvement in gas exchange.
Despite these measures, the patient continues to experience significant respiratory distress and fatigue, with persistent crackles auscultated throughout the lung fields. An arterial blood gas analysis reveals a pH of 7.30, PaCO2 of 50 mmHg, and PaO2 of 55 mmHg, confirming the presence of respiratory acidosis and hypoxemia. Electrolyte panels show mild hypokalemia, with a potassium level of 3.2 mEq/L, potentially contributing to an elevated risk for arrhythmias. Continuous cardiac monitoring reveals occasional premature ventricular contractions, heightening concern for potential progression to more serious dysrhythmias.
The team discusses the possibility of mechanical ventilation support to alleviate the work of breathing and improve oxygenation, alongside considering urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to address the underlying ischemic burden. The patient's overall condition underscores the urgency of addressing both respiratory compromise and myocardial perfusion. The priority remains stabilizing the patient to prevent further deterioration while preparing for possible escalation in care, including transfer to the cardiac catheterization lab if deemed necessary.
Section 4
As the medical team evaluates the patient's ongoing respiratory distress and declining oxygen levels, they decide to initiate non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as a step before considering mechanical ventilation. The patient is placed on BiPAP, with settings adjusted to improve alveolar ventilation and decrease the work of breathing. Within the first 15 minutes of BiPAP initiation, the patient's respiratory rate decreases slightly to 22 breaths per minute, and his oxygen saturation improves to 92%. Despite these positive changes, the patient remains visibly fatigued and continues to exhibit labored breathing patterns.
A repeat arterial blood gas analysis is performed to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. The results show a pH of 7.34, PaCO2 of 46 mmHg, and PaO2 of 60 mmHg, indicating partial correction of the respiratory acidosis but persistent hypoxemia. Meanwhile, the electrolyte imbalance is addressed by administering intravenous potassium chloride to correct the hypokalemia, with a target to stabilize the potassium level above 4.0 mEq/L to reduce the risk of arrhythmias.
However, during continuous cardiac monitoring, the frequency of premature ventricular contractions increases, prompting the team to consider the potential need for antiarrhythmic therapy. The patient's condition remains precarious, with the next critical decision being whether to proceed with urgent PCI to restore myocardial perfusion, given the ongoing ischemic risk and its contribution to the patient's clinical picture. The team prepares for the possibility of rapid transfer to the cardiac catheterization lab, emphasizing the need for timely intervention to prevent further deterioration.
Section 5
As the medical team deliberates on the next steps, the patient's condition begins to exhibit new complications. Approximately 30 minutes after initiating BiPAP, the patient complains of increasing chest pain, which he rates as 8 out of 10, and there is a noticeable change in his skin color, with pallor and diaphoresis becoming more pronounced. His blood pressure drops to 90/60 mmHg, heart rate spikes to 110 beats per minute, and his respiratory rate, although slightly decreased, remains elevated at 22 breaths per minute with labored effort. These signs suggest worsening myocardial ischemia, likely due to insufficient coronary perfusion.
The decision is made to urgently proceed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to address the suspected coronary artery blockage. As preparations are underway for transfer to the cardiac catheterization lab, the patient's electrocardiogram shows ST-segment elevations in the anterior leads, corroborating the diagnosis of an acute anterior myocardial infarction. The presence of frequent premature ventricular contractions and the risk of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation further underscore the critical need for intervention.
Throughout this period, the nursing team plays a crucial role in monitoring vital signs, ensuring the patient’s comfort, and providing reassurance. An intravenous nitroglycerin infusion is started to help alleviate the chest pain and improve coronary blood flow, while continuous cardiac monitoring is maintained. The clinical team remains vigilant for any signs of hemodynamic instability or arrhythmias, recognizing the precarious balance between maintaining adequate perfusion and preventing further cardiac compromise. The urgency of the situation demands coordinated efforts to stabilize the patient and facilitate the swift execution of PCI, aiming to restore myocardial perfusion and avert additional complications.