multiple myeloma - Nursing Case Study

Pathophysiology

• Primary mechanism: In multiple myeloma, malignant plasma cells proliferate in the bone marrow, disrupting normal blood cell production and causing anemia, increased infection risk, and bleeding disorders.

• Secondary mechanism: These malignant plasma cells produce excessive monoclonal immunoglobulins (M-proteins), which impair normal antibody function, contributing to immunodeficiency and renal damage due to protein deposition in kidneys.

• Key complication: Osteolytic lesions occur due to increased osteoclast activity stimulated by myeloma cells, leading to bone pain, fractures, and hypercalcemia, significantly affecting patient mobility and quality of life.

Patient Profile

Demographics:

62-year-old female, retired school teacher

History:

• Key past medical history: Hypertension, osteopenia, and a history of recurrent respiratory infections

• Current medications: Amlodipine, Calcium supplements, and Aspirin

• Allergies: Penicillin

Current Presentation:

• Chief complaint: Fatigue and bone pain

• Key symptoms: Persistent back pain, anemia, and recurrent infections

• Vital signs: Blood pressure 145/90 mmHg, heart rate 102 bpm, respiratory rate 22 breaths/min, temperature 37.8°C

Section 1

New Diagnostic Results:

Following the patient's initial presentation, a series of diagnostic tests were performed to further evaluate her condition. A complete blood count (CBC) revealed a significant drop in hemoglobin to 8.5 g/dL, confirming the presence of anemia. Serum protein electrophoresis showed a high level of monoclonal protein (M-protein) at 3.7 g/dL, indicative of multiple myeloma activity. Additionally, serum calcium was elevated at 11.5 mg/dL, correlating with the patient's complaints of bone pain and fatigue and suggesting hypercalcemia due to osteolytic activity. A skeletal survey disclosed multiple osteolytic lesions, particularly in the vertebrae and pelvis, which accounted for the persistent back pain.

These findings prompted further investigation into the renal function, as the excessive M-protein can lead to renal impairment. A basic metabolic panel revealed elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels at 30 mg/dL and 2.2 mg/dL, respectively, indicating a decline in renal function possibly exacerbated by hypercalcemia. Urinalysis showed proteinuria, supporting the hypothesis of kidney damage secondary to monoclonal protein deposition. Given these results, the medical team discussed the initiation of bisphosphonate therapy to address bone resorption and potential renal protective strategies, while considering the need for chemotherapy to manage the plasma cell proliferation.

These diagnostic results emphasize the complexity of multiple myeloma management and create an opportunity for clinical reasoning regarding prioritization of interventions, such as managing hypercalcemia and renal impairment while planning for long-term oncological treatment. As the patient's journey continues, monitoring for further complications, such as renal failure or pathological fractures, remains critical to her care plan.

Section 2

Change in Patient Status:

Shortly after the initiation of bisphosphonate therapy to address the patient's hypercalcemia and osteolytic activity, the medical team noticed a change in her clinical status. The patient began experiencing increased fatigue, confusion, and generalized weakness, prompting a reassessment of her condition. Vital signs revealed hypotension with a blood pressure of 88/56 mmHg, a heart rate of 102 bpm, and a low-grade fever of 99.8°F. These findings, coupled with her recent treatment, raised concerns about potential side effects or complications from the therapy.

Laboratory tests were ordered to investigate the underlying cause of her symptoms. Serum electrolytes showed a significant drop in calcium levels to 7.8 mg/dL, indicating possible overcorrection of hypercalcemia. Additionally, her BUN and creatinine levels had increased further to 38 mg/dL and 2.8 mg/dL, respectively, suggesting worsening renal impairment. A repeat urinalysis confirmed persistent proteinuria, while a blood culture was ordered to rule out infection as a cause of her fever and hypotension.

These developments required immediate clinical reasoning to adjust the patient's management plan. The healthcare team decided to temporarily hold the bisphosphonate therapy and initiate calcium supplementation to address the hypocalcemia. Careful monitoring of renal function and consideration of renal dose adjustments in future treatment plans were prioritized. Additionally, the team prepared for potential interventions to prevent further renal deterioration and evaluated the need for dialysis if renal function continued to decline. This change in patient status highlighted the delicate balance needed in managing multiple myeloma complications and underscored the importance of ongoing assessment and timely intervention.

Section 3

New Diagnostic Results:

Following the decision to hold bisphosphonate therapy and initiate calcium supplementation, the patient was closely monitored. Despite these interventions, her confusion and generalized weakness persisted, prompting additional diagnostic tests to explore other potential causes. A comprehensive metabolic panel was repeated, revealing a slight improvement in calcium levels to 8.2 mg/dL; however, her renal function showed no significant change, with BUN at 40 mg/dL and creatinine slightly up at 3.0 mg/dL. This lack of renal recovery suggested ongoing renal compromise related to her multiple myeloma.

A bone marrow biopsy was conducted to assess the current state of her disease. Results indicated a significant increase in plasma cells, now accounting for 60% of the marrow cellularity, up from 40% in previous evaluations. This finding suggested a progression of the myeloma, potentially explaining her persistent symptoms and complicating her treatment plan. Concurrently, the blood culture results returned positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis, a common skin contaminant but also a potential pathogen in immunocompromised individuals, raising concerns about a possible line infection.

These diagnostic results necessitated a reevaluation of the patient's management strategy. The healthcare team considered the initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics to address the potential infection while coordinating with a nephrologist to explore renal support options. The progression of her multiple myeloma required a multidisciplinary approach to adjust her therapeutic regimen, potentially considering alternative agents that could offer disease control with a more favorable renal profile. The interplay of infection, renal impairment, and disease progression underscored the complexity of her condition and the need for dynamic, responsive care.

Section 4

New Complications:

Despite the initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics to combat the potential Staphylococcus epidermidis infection, the patient's condition began to deteriorate further. Within 48 hours, she developed a fever of 102.5°F, accompanied by chills and an increased heart rate of 110 beats per minute. Her blood pressure was noted at 90/60 mmHg, indicating a possible systemic response to infection, suggestive of sepsis. This was a concerning development given her immunocompromised state due to both her multiple myeloma and the intensified plasma cell infiltration in her bone marrow.

In parallel, her renal function continued to decline, with her creatinine rising to 3.5 mg/dL and her urine output decreasing significantly, suggesting acute kidney injury. This renal deterioration was compounded by her multiple myeloma, which was now more aggressive, as evidenced by the increased plasma cells. The healthcare team faced the challenge of managing her sepsis while addressing her worsening renal status. They initiated intravenous fluids to support her blood pressure and renal perfusion, while also considering the adjustment of her antibiotic regimen based on culture sensitivities.

The patient's worsening condition necessitated a reassessment of her treatment priorities, balancing the need to control the infection against the backdrop of her progressing myeloma and declining renal function. The interdisciplinary team, including oncology, nephrology, and infectious disease specialists, convened to refine her care plan. They discussed the potential need for dialysis should her renal function not improve, as well as the possibility of introducing a novel therapeutic agent targeting her multiple myeloma, which might offer better disease control with less renal toxicity. This holistic, adaptive approach was essential in navigating the complex interplay of her multiple conditions.

Section 5

The interdisciplinary team decided to prioritize the management of the patient's sepsis to stabilize her condition, allowing for potential future interventions for her multiple myeloma. In response to the initial interventions, including fluid resuscitation and a refined antibiotic regimen, there was a slight improvement in her vital signs over the next 24 hours. The patient's fever reduced to 101.2°F, and her heart rate decreased to 100 beats per minute, suggesting a partial response to treatment. However, her blood pressure remained low at 92/62 mmHg, indicating ongoing hemodynamic instability.

New diagnostic results provided further insight into her condition. Blood cultures confirmed the presence of Staphylococcus epidermidis, reinforcing the decision to continue the targeted antibiotic therapy. Despite this, her renal function remained a significant concern, with creatinine levels further elevating to 4.2 mg/dL and urine output continuing to dwindle. An emergent renal ultrasound was performed, which revealed no signs of obstruction, suggesting that her renal impairment was likely due to acute tubular necrosis secondary to sepsis and myeloma-associated light chain deposition.

Given the persistent decline in renal function, the nephrology team recommended initiating dialysis to manage her acute kidney injury and prevent further systemic complications. Meanwhile, the oncology team was evaluating the introduction of a proteasome inhibitor, which could potentially stabilize her myeloma with a more favorable renal profile. This proposed treatment shift was discussed with the patient and her family, highlighting the importance of balancing infection control with aggressive myeloma management to improve her overall prognosis. As the team moved forward, careful monitoring and coordinated care were crucial to adapting her treatment plan in response to her evolving clinical status.