seizures - Nursing Case Study
Pathophysiology
• Primary mechanism: Seizures are primarily caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain, which results from a sudden imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters. This imbalance leads to excessive neuronal firing, disrupting normal brain function.
• Secondary mechanism: The failure of inhibitory systems, particularly the malfunction of GABAergic pathways, contributes to the inability to suppress these excessive neuronal discharges, further exacerbating seizure activity.
• Key complication: Prolonged or recurrent seizures can lead to neuronal injury, increasing the risk of chronic epilepsy, cognitive impairments, and decreased quality of life, highlighting the importance of timely intervention and management.
Patient Profile
Demographics:
42-year-old female, elementary school teacher
History:
• Key past medical history: History of epilepsy diagnosed 5 years ago, hypertension managed for 10 years
• Current medications: Lamotrigine 150 mg twice daily, Lisinopril 10 mg daily
• Allergies: Penicillin
Current Presentation:
• Chief complaint: Increased frequency of seizures over the past month
• Key symptoms: Episodes of confusion and staring, muscle twitching, postictal drowsiness, mild headache
• Vital signs: Blood pressure 150/95 mmHg, heart rate 88 bpm, respiratory rate 20 breaths per minute, temperature 98.6°F, oxygen saturation 94% on room air
Section 1
Initial Assessment Findings:
Upon further assessment, the nursing team notes that the patient exhibits subtle right-sided facial drooping and slight weakness in her right arm, which she reports as intermittent. These findings are concerning for potential focal neurological deficits. Her blood pressure remains elevated at 152/98 mmHg, and her heart rate has increased to 92 bpm. The patient's oxygen saturation has decreased slightly to 92% on room air. She appears fatigued and exhibits postictal confusion, struggling to recall recent events and having difficulty focusing during the assessment. Her speech is slightly slurred, which was not previously documented.
The nurse conducts a more detailed neurological evaluation, observing that the patient has a positive Babinski sign on the right side and diminished reflexes in the right upper extremity. Given these findings and the patient's history of increased seizure frequency, there is a growing concern about the possibility of a recent or ongoing seizure-induced cerebrovascular event or a lesion affecting the left hemisphere of the brain. The nurse prioritizes these findings and promptly communicates them to the healthcare provider, recognizing the need for urgent neuroimaging and further diagnostic evaluation to determine the cause of these new symptoms.
These developments necessitate a reevaluation of the current treatment strategy, as the presence of focal neurological signs suggests a potential complication beyond typical seizure activity. The healthcare team is prompted to consider adjustments to the patient's seizure management plan, including modifications to her antiepileptic medication regimen and addressing the increased blood pressure, which may be contributing to her current presentation. This situation underscores the importance of integrating clinical reasoning to explore the underlying causes of her symptoms, ensuring timely intervention to prevent further complications and optimize her neurological function and quality of life.
Section 2
New Diagnostic Results:
Following the nurse's communication, the healthcare provider orders an urgent CT scan of the brain to investigate the cause of the patient's new focal neurological deficits. The imaging reveals a small area of hypodensity in the region supplied by the left middle cerebral artery, suggestive of an acute ischemic stroke. This finding aligns with the patient's right-sided weakness and facial drooping, indicating that the seizures may have been either a consequence of the stroke or a trigger for its occurrence. Additionally, the MRI performed subsequently confirms the presence of a small embolic infarct, further necessitating a reevaluation of her management plan.
In light of these findings, the multidisciplinary team discusses the need to initiate anticoagulation therapy to address the risk of further thromboembolic events. However, this decision is weighed cautiously against the potential risk of exacerbating the patient's seizures. The team also considers the potential need for adjustments to her antiepileptic medications to better control her seizure activity, which may have been contributing to the cerebrovascular event. Additionally, her elevated blood pressure is addressed as a risk factor for stroke, leading to an adjustment in her antihypertensive regimen to achieve better control.
These diagnostic results underscore the complexity of the patient's condition, highlighting the interconnected nature of her neurological and cardiovascular health. The healthcare team must now integrate these findings into a cohesive plan that balances seizure management with stroke prevention, ensuring that interventions are both timely and appropriate. The patient's response to these new interventions will be closely monitored, with particular attention to any changes in her neurological status or seizure frequency, guiding further adjustments to her treatment strategy as needed.
Section 3
New Complications:
Several days into the adjusted treatment plan, the patient experiences a sudden and unexpected decline in her condition. She presents with increased confusion and a marked decrease in responsiveness, prompting an immediate reassessment by the nursing team. Vital signs reveal a blood pressure of 180/100 mmHg, heart rate of 110 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 24 breaths per minute, and an oxygen saturation of 90% on room air. Neurological assessment shows a further deterioration in her right-sided weakness, now accompanied by slurred speech and a diminished level of consciousness, suggesting the possibility of another cerebrovascular event or evolving complications.
Laboratory tests are urgently performed, revealing an elevated white blood cell count and increased inflammatory markers, raising concerns about a potential infection or inflammatory process contributing to her presentation. Additionally, her serum sodium level is found to be abnormally low at 127 mmol/L, indicating hyponatremia, which may be exacerbating her neurological symptoms. These findings prompt the healthcare team to consider the possibility of a new or ongoing embolic event, infection, or complications related to her medications, such as antiepileptics or antihypertensives contributing to electrolyte imbalance.
In response to these complications, the multidisciplinary team adjusts the patient's care plan to address the immediate concerns. Intravenous fluids are initiated to correct the hyponatremia, and a broad-spectrum antibiotic is started empirically to cover potential infectious causes while awaiting further culture results. The anticoagulation regimen is re-evaluated, balancing the risk of further embolic events against the potential for hemorrhagic complications. Continuous monitoring of her neurological status and frequent reassessment of her vitals are prioritized to detect any further changes promptly. The patient's response to these interventions will guide the next steps in her management, with a focus on stabilizing her condition and preventing further deterioration.
Section 4
As the multidisciplinary team continues to address the patient’s immediate needs, her response to the interventions provides mixed results. Over the next 24 hours, the intravenous fluids successfully increase her serum sodium level to 134 mmol/L, and there is a slight improvement in her neurological status; her speech becomes somewhat clearer, and her level of consciousness increases slightly, allowing her to follow simple commands. However, her right-sided weakness remains unchanged, and she continues to experience intermittent confusion. Vital signs show a mild improvement with her blood pressure decreasing to 160/95 mmHg and her heart rate stabilizing at 100 beats per minute, but her oxygen saturation remains at 91% on room air, indicating ongoing respiratory compromise.
Newly obtained diagnostic results provide further insight into her condition. A repeat CT scan of the brain reveals no new ischemic changes, ruling out an acute cerebrovascular event. However, a chest X-ray shows bilateral infiltrates suggestive of a possible aspiration pneumonia or pulmonary edema contributing to her hypoxia. Blood cultures return positive for gram-negative bacilli, confirming a bacterial infection likely responsible for the elevated inflammatory markers and leukocytosis seen earlier. This finding prompts the infectious disease specialist to adjust the antibiotic regimen to better target the identified pathogen.
Despite these adjustments, the patient develops a new complication: she begins to exhibit signs of acute kidney injury, with her creatinine level rising from 1.0 mg/dL to 1.8 mg/dL and her urine output decreasing significantly. This development necessitates careful consideration of her fluid management and medication dosages, as the team must balance the need to maintain adequate perfusion and address the infection without further compromising her renal function. The nursing team intensifies their monitoring efforts, focusing on fluid balance, renal function, and ongoing infection control to prevent further decline. This unfolding scenario highlights the complexity of her condition and the need for continued vigilance and adaptability in her care plan.
Section 5
As the medical team continues to manage the patient's complex condition, a new development arises that further complicates her clinical picture. The nursing staff observes that the patient is becoming increasingly lethargic and less responsive to verbal stimuli. Her Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score has decreased from 13 to 10, indicating a notable decline in her neurological status. Vital signs reveal a concerning trend; her blood pressure has dropped to 145/90 mmHg, but her heart rate has increased to 112 beats per minute, suggesting compensatory mechanisms are at play. Additionally, her oxygen saturation has decreased to 88% on room air, prompting the initiation of supplemental oxygen to maintain adequate oxygenation.
In light of these changes, the team conducts a comprehensive reassessment to identify the underlying causes of her deterioration. Repeat laboratory tests show a further increase in her creatinine level to 2.2 mg/dL, confirming the progression of acute kidney injury. Despite adjustments to her antibiotics, her white blood cell count remains elevated at 16,000/mm³, indicating persistent infection or inflammation. Arterial blood gas analysis reveals a mixed respiratory and metabolic acidosis, with a pH of 7.31, pCO2 of 50 mmHg, and HCO3 of 18 mEq/L. These findings necessitate a reevaluation of her treatment plan, emphasizing the need to optimize her respiratory support, adjust fluid management to prevent further renal compromise, and refine her antibiotic therapy.
The multidisciplinary team convenes to discuss potential interventions, considering the possibility of initiating renal replacement therapy if her renal function continues to decline. The focus shifts to stabilizing her hemodynamics, improving her respiratory status, and ensuring effective clearance of the infection. The nursing team plays a crucial role in monitoring her response to these interventions, providing continuous assessment and education to her family about the evolving situation. This stage of her care journey underscores the importance of dynamic clinical reasoning and the need to anticipate and respond to rapidly changing patient conditions.