hip replacement - Nursing Case Study

Pathophysiology

• Primary mechanism: Osteoarthritis leads to the degeneration of articular cartilage in the hip joint, resulting in bone-on-bone contact that causes pain and reduced mobility. This is the most common reason for hip replacement surgery, aiming to restore joint function and alleviate discomfort.

• Secondary mechanism: Inflammatory processes and microtrauma within the joint exacerbate cartilage degradation and contribute to osteophyte formation. These bone spurs can further restrict movement and cause additional pain, warranting surgical intervention.

• Key complication: Avascular necrosis may occur due to compromised blood supply to the femoral head, leading to bone tissue death and joint collapse. Hip replacement addresses these structural issues by replacing the damaged joint components with prosthetics, improving stability and function.

Patient Profile

Demographics:

65-year-old male, retired construction worker

History:

• Key past medical history: Osteoarthritis, hypertension, type 2 diabetes

• Current medications: Metformin, lisinopril, acetaminophen

• Allergies: Penicillin

Current Presentation:

• Chief complaint: Increasing pain and swelling in the operated hip

• Key symptoms: Redness around the surgical site, low-grade fever, limited range of motion

• Vital signs: Blood pressure 145/90 mmHg, heart rate 92 bpm, respiratory rate 20 breaths per minute, temperature 100.4°F (38°C)

Section 1

As the healthcare team continues to monitor the 65-year-old male patient post-hip replacement, new diagnostic results reveal concerning developments. A complete blood count (CBC) shows elevated white blood cell count at 15,000 cells/mcL, indicating a potential infection. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are also elevated at 12 mg/L, further supporting the presence of inflammation or infection. Additionally, an X-ray of the hip reveals no signs of prosthetic loosening, but there is evidence of peri-prosthetic lucency, suggesting possible early infection or inflammation around the implant.

The patient's clinical status is closely observed, with a particular focus on the operated hip. Swelling and redness persist, and the patient reports increased pain despite medication. The low-grade fever has remained constant, and the patient is experiencing increased fatigue and malaise. These symptoms, alongside the laboratory findings, raise the suspicion of a post-surgical infection, a moderate complication that requires immediate attention.

In response, the healthcare team initiates a treatment plan that includes the administration of broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, taking into account the patient's penicillin allergy. Wound cultures are obtained to identify the specific pathogen responsible for the infection, which will guide targeted antibiotic therapy. The patient is also encouraged to continue with gentle physiotherapy to maintain as much mobility as possible while avoiding strain on the affected hip. This intervention aims to address the infection promptly while minimizing further complications, paving the way for the next steps in the patient’s recovery journey.

Section 2

The healthcare team closely monitors the patient's response to the initiated treatment plan. Within 48 hours, there are noticeable changes in the patient's clinical status. The patient's temperature rises slightly to 100.6°F, and the swelling around the hip has not subsided, though the erythema appears slightly reduced. The patient reports that the pain has not significantly improved, maintaining a consistent 6 out of 10 on the pain scale, despite the prescribed analgesics. However, the patient mentions a slight increase in mobility during physiotherapy sessions, suggesting some positive response to the intervention.

New diagnostic results return, providing critical insights into the patient's condition. The wound cultures identify Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as the pathogen responsible for the infection. This finding necessitates an adjustment in the antibiotic regimen. The healthcare team promptly transitions the patient to a targeted antibiotic therapy using intravenous vancomycin, tailored to effectively combat the MRSA infection. Additionally, the latest CBC shows a slight reduction in the white blood cell count to 13,500 cells/mcL, indicating a potential early response to the broad-spectrum antibiotics, although the CRP level remains elevated at 10 mg/L.

As the targeted therapy begins, the healthcare team remains vigilant for any new complications. Concerns about potential renal impairment due to vancomycin usage prompt regular monitoring of renal function through serum creatinine levels and urine output. The patient's renal function remains stable, with creatinine levels at 1.1 mg/dL. The team continues to emphasize the importance of adequate hydration and gentle mobilization. These developments highlight the complexity of managing post-surgical infections and underscore the importance of timely, targeted interventions to prevent further complications and promote recovery. The focus now shifts to ensuring sustained improvement and preventing recurrence as the patient's recovery journey progresses.

Section 3

As the healthcare team continues to monitor the patient, a change in patient status becomes apparent three days into the adjusted treatment plan. The patient's temperature has normalized at 98.8°F, suggesting a favorable response to the vancomycin regimen. However, while the erythema has decreased, the swelling persists, and the pain level remains at a 5 out of 10, only slightly improved. The patient reports difficulty sleeping due to pain, which affects their overall energy and mood, manifesting in slight irritability during interactions with the healthcare staff. The team notes that while the infection appears to be responding to the antibiotic, the patient's quality of life is being impacted by unresolved symptoms.

To address these ongoing concerns, the team conducts a comprehensive reassessment. The latest CBC shows further reduction in white blood cell count to 11,000 cells/mcL, indicating continued response to the antibiotics, while renal function remains stable with creatinine levels holding at 1.0 mg/dL. The team also observes that the patient's mobility has improved marginally; they can now perform light activities with less assistance. However, the persistent swelling raises concerns about potential deep vein thrombosis (DVT), prompting an immediate ultrasound of the affected limb, which fortunately returns negative for DVT.

In light of these findings, the healthcare team decides to escalate the pain management strategy by consulting with a pain specialist, considering options such as nerve blocks or alternative analgesics that might provide better relief without compromising renal function. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of continued physiotherapy to encourage circulation and facilitate lymphatic drainage, aiming to reduce swelling. This phase of the patient's journey emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach, balancing infection control with pain management and functional rehabilitation to optimize recovery and prevent further complications.

Section 4

As the healthcare team continues to manage the patient's care, they notice a new development on the fifth day post-intervention. Although the patient's pain level remains at a consistent 5 out of 10, there is an unexpected rise in the patient's heart rate, now recording at 110 beats per minute. Blood pressure has also increased slightly to 145/90 mmHg. These changes prompt the team to conduct further investigations to rule out any complications that might be brewing beneath the surface.

A repeat CBC is ordered alongside a C-reactive protein (CRP) test. The results reveal a CRP level that has not decreased as expected, instead showing a slight uptick to 18 mg/L, suggesting lingering inflammation. This finding, coupled with the persistent swelling and heightened cardiovascular signs, directs the team’s attention to a possible inflammatory response rather than an infectious one. Additionally, a repeat ultrasound of the hip reveals a small but increasing effusion at the surgical site, which was not as pronounced in previous assessments.

The team decides to adjust the treatment plan to address this potential inflammatory complication. They consult with both the surgical team and a rheumatologist to evaluate the need for anti-inflammatory therapy or possible joint aspiration to relieve the effusion. Meanwhile, they continue advanced pain management and physiotherapy, now focusing on techniques to manage both pain and inflammation. This multi-pronged approach reflects the complexity of the case, requiring professionals to balance multiple aspects of care to optimize patient outcomes and prevent further setbacks.

Section 5

As the healthcare team continues monitoring the patient, they observe a notable change in the patient's status on the seventh day post-intervention. The patient reports increased stiffness and difficulty in mobility during physiotherapy sessions, despite adherence to the pain management protocol. The patient also mentions feeling more fatigued than usual, which raises concerns among the care team. A closer physical assessment reveals that the swelling around the surgical site has not only persisted but has also become slightly tender and warmer to the touch. These clinical signs suggest an evolving complication that requires immediate attention.

In light of these findings, the team prioritizes a more aggressive approach to managing the suspected inflammatory response. They decide to initiate a course of NSAIDs, carefully balancing the potential gastrointestinal side effects with the need to reduce inflammation. Furthermore, a joint aspiration is performed under sterile conditions to analyze the synovial fluid for clarity. The analysis shows an elevated white blood cell count, predominantly neutrophils, further confirming the inflammatory nature of the effusion. This result reassures the team that an infectious process is unlikely, but vigilance is maintained.

In response to the interventions, the patient begins to show gradual improvement. By the ninth day, there is a slight reduction in both the effusion and the patient's heart rate, now recording at 98 beats per minute. The patient also reports a decrease in stiffness, allowing for more effective participation in physiotherapy sessions. These positive changes suggest that the tailored anti-inflammatory strategy is taking effect, though the team remains cautious, ready to adjust the care plan as necessary, and continues to monitor for any new complications. This delicate balance between intervention and observation underscores the importance of clinical reasoning and interdisciplinary collaboration in managing complex postoperative cases.