abdominal pain - Nursing Case Study
Pathophysiology
• Primary mechanism: Visceral pain arises from the distention, inflammation, or ischemia of internal organs. Nociceptors in the organ walls are stimulated, leading to poorly localized, dull, or cramping pain, often accompanied by autonomic responses like nausea or sweating.
• Secondary mechanism: Parietal pain occurs when inflammation extends to the parietal peritoneum, causing sharp, localized pain. This pain is typically more intense and can be pinpointed by the patient due to the rich innervation of the peritoneal lining.
• Key complication: Referred pain results from the convergence of sensory pathways, causing pain perception at a site distant from the affected organ. This can delay diagnosis as the patient may report pain in areas unrelated to the underlying pathology.
Patient Profile
Demographics:
45-year-old female, office manager
History:
• Key past medical history: History of peptic ulcer disease, hypertension
• Current medications: Lisinopril 10 mg daily, Omeprazole 20 mg daily
• Allergies: Penicillin
Current Presentation:
• Chief complaint: Abdominal pain
• Key symptoms: Intermittent cramping, bloating, nausea, occasional vomiting, mild fever
• Vital signs: Temperature: 100.4°F (38°C), Heart rate: 104 bpm, Blood pressure: 138/88 mmHg, Respiratory rate: 22 breaths per minute
Section 1
As the patient undergoes initial assessment in the emergency department, further physical examination reveals tenderness in the epigastric region with guarding and rigidity, suggesting the possibility of peritonitis. The patient's pain intensifies when pressure is applied to the area and is somewhat relieved upon release. Given her history of peptic ulcer disease, there is a concern for possible ulcer perforation. The nurse notes that the patient appears pale and is diaphoretic, indicating heightened autonomic response and potential systemic involvement. Her abdominal pain has now become more constant rather than intermittent, raising the suspicion of a more serious underlying issue.
Laboratory results return with a white blood cell count of 16,000/mm³, indicating leukocytosis and a potential inflammatory or infectious process. Her serum amylase and lipase levels are slightly elevated, which could suggest pancreatic involvement or be a consequence of the inflammatory process. Basic metabolic panel results show a mild elevation in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine, which could indicate early signs of dehydration or compromised renal function secondary to vomiting and potential fluid loss. An abdominal X-ray reveals free air under the diaphragm, confirming the suspicion of perforation, likely from a peptic ulcer.
Given these findings, the clinical team discusses the need for urgent surgical intervention and prepares the patient for transfer to the surgical unit. The escalating severity of her abdominal pain, along with the evidence of perforation and peritoneal irritation, underscores the necessity for prompt surgical evaluation to prevent further complications such as sepsis or shock. The patient is placed on intravenous fluids to maintain hydration and electrolyte balance, and pain management is initiated with careful consideration of her current medications and allergy status. The interdisciplinary team, including surgery, nursing, and anesthesia, collaborates to optimize her preoperative care, ensuring that she is closely monitored for any further changes in status.
Section 2
As the patient is prepared for the surgical intervention, the clinical team observes a change in her status that warrants immediate attention. Her vital signs reveal a concerning pattern: her blood pressure has dropped to 90/60 mmHg, and her heart rate has increased to 120 beats per minute. These findings suggest a possible progression towards hypovolemic shock, likely due to fluid loss from the perforated ulcer. Additionally, her respiratory rate has increased to 24 breaths per minute, indicating compensatory mechanisms are being activated in response to her hemodynamic instability. Her oxygen saturation is slightly decreased at 92%, prompting the team to administer supplemental oxygen to maintain adequate tissue perfusion.
In response to these changes, the nursing team swiftly increases the rate of intravenous fluid administration, aiming to optimize her intravascular volume and stabilize her blood pressure. Continuous cardiac and hemodynamic monitoring is initiated to closely track any further alterations in her status. Recognizing the potential for sepsis, the team also initiates broad-spectrum antibiotics to address any bacterial contamination from the perforation. Given the elevated white blood cell count and the patient's deteriorating condition, this intervention is critical in preventing the progression of systemic infection.
The interdisciplinary team's coordinated efforts result in a temporary stabilization of the patient's condition, though her status remains fragile. The surgical team is updated on her current vitals and laboratory findings, which include a lactate level of 3.5 mmol/L, further indicating tissue hypoperfusion and metabolic stress. This information underscores the urgency of surgical intervention to address the source of infection and halt the cascade of complications. As she is transported to the operating room, the clinical team remains vigilant, prepared to manage any further complications that may arise during her perioperative course.
Section 3
As the patient arrives in the operating room, the surgical team conducts a thorough preoperative assessment to ensure a comprehensive understanding of her current status. Despite the initial stabilization efforts, her blood pressure remains marginal at 95/65 mmHg, and her heart rate is persistently elevated at 118 beats per minute, indicating ongoing hemodynamic instability. Her respiratory rate is slightly improved at 22 breaths per minute, and her oxygen saturation has increased to 94% with supplemental oxygen. However, her skin remains cool and clammy, a sign of inadequate peripheral perfusion.
New diagnostic results from the latest blood work reveal a further increase in lactate level to 4.2 mmol/L, suggesting that tissue hypoperfusion is still a significant concern. The patient's hemoglobin has decreased to 8.5 g/dL, highlighting the need for potential blood transfusion intraoperatively to address possible blood loss and improve oxygen-carrying capacity. The surgical team discusses the importance of correcting these abnormalities to optimize her condition before and during the procedure.
As the surgery progresses, the team closely monitors for any signs of worsening acidosis or further hemodynamic compromise. The anesthesiologist adjusts fluid and vasopressor support to maintain adequate blood pressure and organ perfusion. The presence of a significant amount of purulent fluid in the abdominal cavity confirms the extent of the perforation and reinforces the decision to continue with aggressive antibiotic therapy. Postoperative plans are made for intensive care monitoring, including serial lactate measurements and blood gas analyses, to assess the patient's response to the surgical intervention and guide further management. The team's proactive approach and careful monitoring aim to prevent the emergence of additional complications as the patient begins her recovery phase.
Section 4
As the surgical team continues to manage the patient's condition, new complications arise in the form of acute kidney injury (AKI), evidenced by a rising creatinine level, now at 2.1 mg/dL, compared to the baseline of 1.0 mg/dL. This suggests impaired renal perfusion, likely secondary to the ongoing hemodynamic instability and tissue hypoperfusion. Despite aggressive fluid resuscitation, the patient's urine output has decreased to 15 mL/hour, indicating oliguria. The nephrology team is consulted, and they recommend careful fluid management to balance the need for renal perfusion with the risk of fluid overload, especially in the context of the patient's compromised cardiovascular status.
In response to these developments, the clinical team re-evaluates the patient's hemodynamic support strategy. The anesthesiologist increases the dosage of vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg, aiming to improve renal perfusion and overall organ function. Additionally, they initiate low-dose dopamine infusion as a renal protective measure, while continuing to monitor the patient's central venous pressure to guide fluid therapy more precisely. The critical care team anticipates the need for further renal support, and discussions about potential dialysis options are initiated, should the patient's renal function continue to deteriorate.
As the patient's recovery progresses in the intensive care unit, the multidisciplinary team maintains a vigilant approach, closely monitoring her renal function and overall hemodynamic status. Serial assessments of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels, along with regular urine output measurements, are performed to detect any further decline in renal performance. The team's goal is to stabilize the patient's condition and prevent further complications, allowing for a smoother transition to the post-operative recovery phase, where continued vigilance and timely interventions will be critical in her journey toward recovery.
Section 5
As the clinical team continues to monitor the patient, a new set of diagnostic results arrives, bringing additional insight into her evolving condition. The latest arterial blood gas analysis reveals a metabolic acidosis with a pH of 7.31, bicarbonate level of 18 mEq/L, and an elevated anion gap of 18 mEq/L. These findings suggest a worsening metabolic derangement, likely driven by the ongoing renal impairment and potential accumulation of uremic toxins. The lactate level is also elevated at 3.5 mmol/L, indicating persistent tissue hypoperfusion despite the adjustments in her hemodynamic management.
In conjunction with these laboratory results, the patient's vital signs show a slight increase in heart rate to 112 beats per minute and a blood pressure reading of 94/58 mmHg, despite the increased vasopressor support. Her respiratory rate is elevated at 24 breaths per minute, reflecting a compensatory response to the metabolic acidosis. The decrease in urine output persists, with only 10 mL/hour over the last monitoring period, exacerbating concerns about her renal function.
These developments prompt the multidisciplinary team to intensify their clinical reasoning. The nephrology team suggests reevaluating the fluid management strategy, considering the risk of fluid overload versus the need to improve renal perfusion. Discussions regarding the initiation of renal replacement therapy become more urgent, as maintaining electrolyte balance and preventing further acidosis are critical. The critical care team considers adjusting the vasopressor regimen and re-assessing the dosing of inotropes to optimize cardiac output and organ perfusion. As the team deliberates, they recognize the importance of timely interventions to stabilize the patient's condition and prevent progression to more severe complications.